Help Center

This section explains how we compile and display voter registration information—everything from party affiliation to demographic breakdowns by age, gender, or ethnicity. If you’ve seen our statewide election results, know that the data here originates from the same general source but focuses on who registered and who actually turned out to vote, rather than specific candidates or ballot measures.

---

Source of Registration Data

We pull precinct-level voter registration files from California’s Statewide Database . In some cases, counties suppress certain precinct-level counts if the total number of registered voters or ballots cast in a precinct is extremely small, so that individual voter identities can’t be inferred. This privacy measure sometimes creates minor discrepancies between our totals and official countywide tallies, but these differences tend to be quite small.

---

How the Data Classifies Voters

Alongside party affiliation (e.g., Democratic, Republican, minor parties, or “Decline to State”), the Statewide Database also categorizes voters by gender and ethnicity. Their methodology relies on dictionary matching—in other words, your name or surname is compared to extensive reference lists that associate certain names with particular ethnic backgrounds or genders. For example:

• Gender: If a voter record doesn’t specify male or female, the statewide database attempts to infer it by seeing which gender that first name most commonly aligns with among all known voter files.
• Ethnic Surnames: They use published dictionaries to identify surnames often associated with specific ethnic groups—like a Passel-Word Spanish surname list, or a specialized list for Korean, Chinese, etc.

These categories belong to the Statewide Database’s process. We simply display the outcome of their classification; we don’t do any extra matching on our own.

---

Larger Areas vs. Smaller Subdistricts

For entire counties, cities, or statewide legislative districts, each precinct’s boundaries typically match up cleanly, so the registration figures in our data represent actual counts. For smaller districts—like individual city council wards or school board trustee areas—precincts may overlap in partial ways. In those cases, we allocate a portion of each precinct’s registered voters, guided by census block population within that overlap. By measuring how much of the precinct’s population lies inside the subdistrict, we can approximate how many registered voters fall under that boundary.

Additionally, our application ensures that registration data aligns with current district boundaries, even for districts that have changed over time due to redistricting. Many traditional datasets tie historical voter registration or turnout figures to the district number as it existed in a given year. This can result in misleading comparisons, as the geographical boundaries of those districts may no longer match.

By linking registration data to the actual geography of a district as it exists today, our platform provides a clearer and more accurate picture of how voter registration trends align with the current political landscape. This approach allows you to analyze trends based on the real-world geography of districts, rather than outdated or unrelated historical boundaries.

---

Why This Data Matters

Understanding voter registration patterns can reveal important trends:

• Party Landscape: Seeing which party holds a registration advantage (or if nonpartisan/“decline to state” voters lead) helps campaigns and policymakers gauge the local electorate’s political leanings.
• Turnout Insights: A high or low turnout rate in certain age, ethnic, or party groups can inform outreach strategies and identify underrepresented populations.
• Demographic Engagement: Tracking how different demographics register—and whether they follow through on Election Day—can shape discussions about civic participation, resource allocation, or targeted voter education.

By visualizing these metrics, you can get a clearer sense of not just how many voters live in a place, but who they are, which groups turn out the most, and where opportunities exist to broaden engagement or address disparities.